Claim · model-written summary
Relative growth rate was high in Group II, moderate in Group I and low in Group III.
- Taxon
- temperate treest0
- Outcome
- Relative growth rate (RGR)e0
- Direction
- highe0
- Qualifier
- Group II, moderate in Group I and low in Group IIIe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValue
Verbatim
e0“Relative growth rate (RGR) was high in Group II, moderate in Group I and low in Group III.”
t0“temperate trees”
Title
Differences in nitrogen economy of temperate trees
T. Shinano; M. Osaki; M. Kato Tree Physiology 2001. doi:10.1093/treephys/21.9.617
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Method / resource Twenty-four tree species were classified into three nitrogen economy groups.
- Association The RGR versus leaf nitrogen regression coefficient was higher in Group II than Group I.
- Association No RGR versus leaf nitrogen relationship was observed in Group III.
- Association RGR per unit leaf nitrogen was important in all three groups.
- Association Leaf nitrogen allocation was particularly important in Groups I and II.
- Observation Dark respiration to net photosynthesis ratio was higher in Group I than Group II.
- Association Leaf nitrogen concentration and net photosynthetic rate had a linear relationship in Group II.
- Association That relationship was not evident in Group I.