Claim · model-written summary
Rice yields were reduced by less than 15% under most of the damage treatments.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- most of the treatments imposede5
- Outcome
- rice yieldse5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Value
- <15%e5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Despite apparently extreme damage treatments, rice yields were reduced by <15% in response to most of the treatments imposed”
t0“Simulated Hail Damage to Rice”
Title
Simulated Hail Damage to Rice: II. Effects during Four Reproductive Growth Stages
Paul A. Counce; Bobby R. Wells; Richard J. Norman; et al. Agronomy Journal 1994. doi:10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600060035x
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Leaf removal caused larger rice yield reductions than culm severing.
- Association Leaf removal at booting and heading caused the greatest rice yield reduction.
- Association Leaf removal at panicle initiation caused the least damage in rice.
- Association Rice yields decreased as more leaves were removed.
- Association Culm severing became progressively more damaging to rice yield as the crop developed through the season.
- Association Culm bending significantly reduced rice yield, except at the 10% level at heading and 14 d after heading.
- Mechanism The rice crop has considerable ability to compensate for physical damage, due in part to the unique biology of the rice plant.
- Association All three types of damage significantly affected rice grain yield at some intensity at all four growth stages.