Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The integrated nutrient management treatment improved soil bulk density, organic carbon, available NPK, microbial biomass carbon and nutrient balance.

A claim from Long-term effects of integrated nutrient management on productivity and soil properties of rice (Oryza sativa)rice cropping system in coastal Odisha · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient management treatment improved soil bulk density, organic carbon, available NPK, microbial biomass carbon and nutrient balance.

Treatment
INM treatmente0
Outcome
bulk density, soil organic carbon, available NPKe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This INM treatment was also most sustainable and improved the physico-chemical properties of the soil with respect to bulk density, soil organic carbon, available NPK, microbial biomass carbon and soil nutrient balance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–893
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–161

Title

Long-term effects of integrated nutrient management on productivity and soil properties of rice (Oryza sativa)rice cropping system in coastal Odisha

K.N. MISHRA; A.K. PATRA; L.M. GARNAYAK; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v62i3.4297

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-1dcd7a1beea5a080b1f3140ba7d6ab59c129a2589d6081117c2672a1e19287b0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

296 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.