Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Carbendazim and thiram seed treatment reduced the kidney bean disease index.

A claim from Preliminary study on pathogen of root rot of kidney bean and its control in Xinjiang. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim and thiram seed treatment reduced the kidney bean disease index.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Carbendazim and thirame0
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
contraste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed germination rate and seedling survival rate of kidney bean were higher than that of the contrast and the disease index was obviously reduced if the seeds were treated with Carbendazim and thiram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1353

Title

Preliminary study on pathogen of root rot of kidney bean and its control in Xinjiang.

Chunhua Wang; Sun Chao; Shuyan Liu Arid Zone Research 2010

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-1e4ff8b09c8fb217c1df0c6edb76acad4946aacbac2a5b2b6d4489133a479af0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

thiram · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

carbendazim · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.