Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar spray with Oraset-x followed by Setter-2 was superior for total green yield, number of pods per plant and weight of ten pods.

A claim from EFFECT OF SOME FOLIAR APPLICATION ON YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN BROAD BEAN (VICIA FABA L.) · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray with Oraset-x followed by Setter-2 was superior for total green yield, number of pods per plant and weight of ten pods.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
foliar spray with Oraset-x followed by Setter -2e5
Outcome
total green yield, number of pods/plant, weight of ten podse5
Direction
superiore5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to study the performance of five broad bean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–201
e5

“The foliar spray with Oraset-x followed by Setter -2 were significantly the superior treatments to produce plants with vigorous vegetative growth, i e., plant height and number of branches/plant, earliness, highest fruit setting percentage, total green yield, number of pods/plant, weight of ten pods, pod characters, weight of 100 green seeds and total protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1372

Title

EFFECT OF SOME FOLIAR APPLICATION ON YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN BROAD BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)

MAGDI A. NOSSER Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 2011. doi:10.21608/ejar.2011.177629

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-1f92bd3f4bf2ee235f3b4dea84982a927f32fe486108aa2c9905d5f94aebb8ab · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.