Claim · model-written summary
Clay content did not differ significantly between the two sites.
- Taxon
- groundnut, sesame and roselle
Arachis hypogaea
Sesamum indicum
Hibiscus sabdariffat0 - Outcome
- clay contente6
- Setting
- both sitese6
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut, sesame and roselle in an Acacia senegal agroforestry system”
e6“Significant differences (P < 0.05) were obtained for sand and silt content on both sites, while clay content was not significantly different on both sites”
Title
Fadl, Kamal Eldin Mohammed Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) 2010
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Intercropping with Acacia senegal reduced groundnut yield by 26.3% relative to sole cropping on both sites.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with Acacia senegal reduced sesame yield by 12% relative to sole cropping on both sites.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with Acacia senegal reduced roselle yield by 20.2% relative to sole cropping on both sites.
- Mechanism The yield reduction in intercropping plots is hypothesised to result from high tree density causing water and light competition.
- Observation Fresh weight differed significantly between systems on both sites.
- Intervention effect Fresh weight was highest in the intercropping system.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen and organic carbon in soil were significantly higher under intercropping than sole cropping at Eldemokeya Forest Reserve.
- Intervention effect Organic carbon, N, P and pH were higher under intercropping at El-Obeid site.
- Observation Soil organic carbon, N and pH did not differ significantly at El-Obeid site.
- Observation Sand and silt content differed significantly between the two sites.
- Observation Dry weights of sesame and roselle differed significantly on both sites.
- Observation Dry weight of groundnut did not differ significantly on both sites.