Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fresh weight was highest in the intercropping system.

A claim from Growth and yield of groundnut, sesame and roselle in an Acacia senegal agroforestry system in North Kordofan, Sudan · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weight was highest in the intercropping system.

Treatment
intercropping systeme1
Outcome
fresh weighte1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut, sesame and roselle in an Acacia senegal agroforestry system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–90
e1

“The highest fresh weight was found in the intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1310

Title

Growth and yield of groundnut, sesame and roselle in an Acacia senegal agroforestry system in North Kordofan, Sudan

Fadl, Kamal Eldin Mohammed Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) 2010

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-45f2c3f887494deaebd878cb906a2ae3e660294bb2638a0b85fbc64267947e18 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

intercropping · growth · Hibiscus sabdariffa (roselle)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · growth · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

intercropping · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.