Paper · 2004 · Acta Ecologica Sinica

Researches on Bi-directional N transfer between the intercropping system of groundnut with rice cultivated in aerobic soil using ~(15)N) foliar labelling method

Chu Gui; Qi Shen

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rice traditionally cultivated in water-logged soil consumes huge amounts of the water resources in China. As a novel water-saving technique, rice cultivated in aerobic soil could almost reach the same yield as that in water-logged soil. Furthermore, rice cultivation in aerobic conditions makes it possible to intercrop rice with legumes, which is regarded as an important part of sustainable agriculture and has a yield advantage expressed by land equivalent ratio (LER). But little information has been available so far about the new intercropping systems. Pot experiments were carried out to study the nitrogen transfer occurring in the system of groundnut intercropped with rice cultivated in aerobic soil at three different nitrogen fertilizer application rates (15 kg hm~(-2), 75 kg hm~(-2) and 150 kg hm~(-2)) using (()~(15)N) foliar labelling method. The results were as follows. The dry weight and total nitrogen accumulated in intercropped rice were 9.410 g plant~(-1), 12.06 g plant1, 13.53 g plant~(-1) and 207.35 mg plant~(-1), 241.81mg plant~(-1), 259.37 mg.plant~(-1) at three nitrogen application rates, namely 15 kg hm~(-2), 75 kg hm~(-2), 150 kg hm~(-2), respectively. Compared with monocropped rice cultivation, the dry weights of rice intercropped were increased by 21%~29%, 7%~29%, 18%~30% at the three N fertilizer application rates, respectively, while the total nitrogen increased by 43.43%, 45.72%, 32.81%, respectively. This result showed that intercropping could enhance significantly the dry weight and total nitrogen of rice crop, especially in the soil with low-N supply. There was no significant differences of the dry weight and total nitrogen of groundnut between the intercropped and monocropped. Using groundnut leaf label (()~(15)N) as (()~(15)N) donor plant, there was good evidence of nitrogen transfer from groundnut to rice, which accounted for about 9.93%, 5.65%, 4.22% of the N accumulated in groundnut at the three N application rates, respectively. The higher the fertilizer application rates, the less amounts of N was transferred from groundnut to rice. Nitrogen transfer from rice to groundnut was also observed in the experiment of rice as (()~(15)N) donor plant, which represented about 4.39%, 2.06%, 1.38% of the N accumulated in rice in the three N application rates, respectively. By using (()~(15)N) foliar labeling method a confident conclusion could be drawn that there existed a bi\|directional N transfer in the intercropping system of groundnut with rice cultivated in aerobic soil. The possible mechanism and path-way of nitrogen transfer in the system of groundnut intercropped with rice were also discussed in detail in this paper.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped rice dry weight increased relative to monocropped rice at all three fertilizer rates.

Treatment
rice intercroppede0
Outcome
dry weights of ricee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%~29%, 7%~29%, 18%~30%e0
Comparator
monocropped ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with monocropped rice cultivation, the dry weights of rice intercropped were increased by 21%~29%, 7%~29%, 18%~30% at the three N fertilizer application rates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped rice accumulated more total nitrogen than monocropped rice at all three fertilizer rates.

Outcome
total nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43.43%, 45.72%, 32.81%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with monocropped rice cultivation, the dry weights of rice intercropped were increased by 21%~29%, 7%~29%, 18%~30% at the three N fertilizer application rates, respectively, while the total nitrogen increased by 43.43%, 45.72%, 32.81%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut dry weight and total nitrogen did not differ significantly between intercropping and monocropping.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Outcome
dry weight and total nitrogen of groundnute0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
monocroppede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant differences of the dry weight and total nitrogen of groundnut between the intercropped and monocropped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1729 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen moved from groundnut to rice, accounting for 9.93%, 5.65%, and 4.22% at increasing N rates.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
nitrogen transfer from groundnut to ricee0
Value
9.93%, 5.65%, 4.22%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was good evidence of nitrogen transfer from groundnut to rice, which accounted for about 9.93%, 5.65%, 4.22% of the N accumulated in groundnut at the three N application rates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1991 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilizer application was associated with less nitrogen transfer from groundnut to rice.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
fertilizer application ratese0
Outcome
N was transferred from groundnut to ricee0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher the fertilizer application rates, the less amounts of N was transferred from groundnut to rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1993–2098 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen moved from rice to groundnut, accounting for 4.39%, 2.06%, and 1.38% at increasing N rates.

Outcome
Nitrogen transfer from rice to groundnute0
Value
4.39%, 2.06%, 1.38%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen transfer from rice to groundnut was also observed in the experiment of rice as (()~(15)N) donor plant, which represented about 4.39%, 2.06%, 1.38% of the N accumulated in rice in the three N application rates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2100–2331 · show in text ↑

intercropping · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 11 positive, 9 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

intercropping · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.