Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of Khon Kaen University in 2001. The objectives of this study were to investigate growth, yield and yield components of corn, peanut, soybean and mungbean under intercropping and single cropping, as well as to assess the land use efficiency. Yield and yield components of corn was unaffected by intercropping system. In legume crops; peanut, soybean and mungbean, intercropping systems reduced the leaf area and top dry weight per plant as compared with single cropping. Grain yield of peanut, soybean and mungbean was reduced by 28%, 39% and 51%, respectively, as compared with single cropping. The pod number per plant was the most affected by intercropping among the yield components. However, corn-legume intercropping increased land use efficiency by 48% to 66% depending on legume species. Corn-peanut intercropping gave the highest land use efficiency. The effects of light penetration and nutrient competition are discussed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping did not affect yield or yield components of corn compared with single cropping.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1 - Treatment
- intercropping systeme4
- Outcome
- Yield and yield componentse4
- Direction
- unaffectede4
- Comparator
- single croppinge1
- Setting
- experimental farm of Khon Kaen Universitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“investigate growth, yield and yield components of corn, peanut, soybean and mungbean under intercropping and single cropping”
e4“Yield and yield components of corn was unaffected by intercropping system”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of Khon Kaen University in 2001”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping reduced leaf area and top dry weight per plant of peanut, soybean and mungbean compared with single cropping.
- Taxon
- peanut, soybean and mungbean
Arachis hypogaea
Glycine max.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae2 - Treatment
- intercropping systemse2
- Outcome
- leaf area and top dry weight per plante2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Comparator
- single croppinge2
- Setting
- experimental farm of Khon Kaen Universitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of Khon Kaen University in 2001”
e2“In legume crops; peanut, soybean and mungbean, intercropping systems reduced the leaf area and top dry weight per plant as compared with single cropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping reduced grain yield of peanut by 28% compared with single cropping.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae3
- Treatment
- intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- Grain yielde3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 28%e3
- Comparator
- single croppinge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“investigate growth, yield and yield components of corn, peanut, soybean and mungbean under intercropping and single cropping”
e3“Grain yield of peanut, soybean and mungbean was reduced by 28%, 39% and 51%, respectively, as compared with single cropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping reduced grain yield of soybean by 39% compared with single cropping.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe3
- Treatment
- intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- Grain yielde3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 39%e3
- Comparator
- single croppinge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“investigate growth, yield and yield components of corn, peanut, soybean and mungbean under intercropping and single cropping”
e3“Grain yield of peanut, soybean and mungbean was reduced by 28%, 39% and 51%, respectively, as compared with single cropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping reduced grain yield of mungbean by 51% compared with single cropping.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae3
- Treatment
- intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- Grain yielde3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 51%e3
- Comparator
- single croppinge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“investigate growth, yield and yield components of corn, peanut, soybean and mungbean under intercropping and single cropping”
e3“Grain yield of peanut, soybean and mungbean was reduced by 28%, 39% and 51%, respectively, as compared with single cropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn-legume intercropping increased land use efficiency by 48% to 66% depending on legume species.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse5
- Treatment
- corn-legume intercroppinge5
- Outcome
- land use efficiencye5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- 48% to 66%e5
- Qualifier
- depending on legume speciese5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“corn-legume intercropping increased land use efficiency by 48% to 66% depending on legume species”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn-peanut intercropping gave the highest land use efficiency.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayse6
- Treatment
- Corn-peanut intercroppinge6
- Outcome
- land use efficiencye6
- Direction
- higheste6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Corn-peanut intercropping gave the highest land use efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping most affected the pod number per plant among the yield components of peanut, soybean and mungbean.
- Taxon
- peanut, soybean and mungbeanArachis hypogaeaGlycine maxVigna radiatae2
- Treatment
- intercroppinge7
- Outcome
- pod number per plante7
- Direction
- most affectede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“In legume crops; peanut, soybean and mungbean, intercropping systems reduced the leaf area and top dry weight per plant as compared with single cropping”
e7“The pod number per plant was the most affected by intercropping among the yield components”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →intercropping · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
115 papers more in this group
See all 119 papers →intercropping · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →intercropping · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →intercropping · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
214 papers more in this group
See all 218 papers →intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
830 papers more in this group
See all 834 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.