Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping reduced grain yield of soybean by 39% compared with single cropping.

A claim from Growth, Yield and Land Use Efficiency of Corn and Legumes Grown under Intercropping Systems · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced grain yield of soybean by 39% compared with single cropping.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe3
Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
Grain yielde3
Direction
reducede3
Value
39%e3
Comparator
single croppinge3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“investigate growth, yield and yield components of corn, peanut, soybean and mungbean under intercropping and single cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–252
e3

“Grain yield of peanut, soybean and mungbean was reduced by 28%, 39% and 51%, respectively, as compared with single cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–652

Title

Growth, Yield and Land Use Efficiency of Corn and Legumes Grown under Intercropping Systems

Anan Polthanee; Vidhaya Trelo-ges Plant Production Science 2003. doi:10.1626/pps.6.139

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-7b8a2b69c53dd1c22aa2508e73d09bb5126559b3443112a715fb7ad548fbf132 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

218 papers: 131 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this claim · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

209 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.