Paper · 2018 · Scientific Reports

Temporal Differentiation of Crop Growth as One of the Drivers of Intercropping Yield Advantage

Nan Dong; Ming-Ming Tang; Wei-Ping Zhang; et al.

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
86
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Intercropping studies usually focus on yield advantage and interspecific interactions but few quantify temporal niche differentiation and its relationship with intercropping yield advantage. A field experiment conducted in northwest China in 2013 and 2014 examined four intercropping systems (oilseed rape/maize, oilseed rape/soybean, potato/maize, and soybean/potato) and the corresponding monocultures. Total dry matter data collected every 20 d after maize emergence were fitted to logistic models to investigate the temporal dynamics of crop growth and interspecific interactions. All four intercropping systems showed significant yield advantages. Temporal niche complementarity between intercropped species was due to differences in sowing and harvesting dates or the time taken to reach maximum daily growth rate or both. Interspecific interactions between intercropped species amplified temporal niche differentiation as indicated by postponement of the time taken to reach maximum daily growth rate of late-maturing crops (i.e. 21 to 41 days in maize associated with oilseed rape or potato). Growth trajectories of intercropped maize or soybean recovered after the oilseed rape harvest to the same values as in their monoculture on a per plant basis. Amplified niche differentiation between crop species depends on the identity of neighboring species whose relative growth rate is crucial in determining the differentiation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

oilseed rape/maize intercropping showed significant yield advantage.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
yield advantagese0
Direction
advantagese0
Qualifier
oilseed rape/maizee0
Comparator
corresponding monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four intercropping systems (oilseed rape/maize, oilseed rape/soybean, potato/maize, and soybean/potato) and the corresponding monocultures. Total dry matter data collected every 20 d after maize emergence were fitted to logistic models to investigate the temporal dynamics of crop growth and interspecific interactions. All four intercropping systems showed significant yield advantages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

oilseed rape/soybean intercropping showed significant yield advantage.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
yield advantagese0
Direction
advantagese0
Qualifier
oilseed rape/soybeane0
Comparator
corresponding monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four intercropping systems (oilseed rape/maize, oilseed rape/soybean, potato/maize, and soybean/potato) and the corresponding monocultures. Total dry matter data collected every 20 d after maize emergence were fitted to logistic models to investigate the temporal dynamics of crop growth and interspecific interactions. All four intercropping systems showed significant yield advantages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

potato/maize intercropping showed significant yield advantage.

Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
yield advantagese0
Direction
advantagese0
Qualifier
potato/maizee0
Comparator
corresponding monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four intercropping systems (oilseed rape/maize, oilseed rape/soybean, potato/maize, and soybean/potato) and the corresponding monocultures. Total dry matter data collected every 20 d after maize emergence were fitted to logistic models to investigate the temporal dynamics of crop growth and interspecific interactions. All four intercropping systems showed significant yield advantages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

soybean/potato intercropping showed significant yield advantage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
yield advantagese0
Direction
advantagese0
Qualifier
soybean/potatoe0
Comparator
corresponding monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four intercropping systems (oilseed rape/maize, oilseed rape/soybean, potato/maize, and soybean/potato) and the corresponding monocultures. Total dry matter data collected every 20 d after maize emergence were fitted to logistic models to investigate the temporal dynamics of crop growth and interspecific interactions. All four intercropping systems showed significant yield advantages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–651 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temporal niche complementarity was attributed to sowing or harvesting date differences or timing of maximum growth rate.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Outcome
Temporal niche complementaritye0
Qualifier
differences in sowing and harvesting dates or the time taken to reach maximum daily growth rate or bothe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Temporal niche complementarity between intercropped species was due to differences in sowing and harvesting dates or the time taken to reach maximum daily growth rate or both”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–827 · show in text ↑
e1

“four intercropping systems (oilseed rape/maize, oilseed rape/soybean, potato/maize, and soybean/potato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–368 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interspecific interactions amplified temporal niche differentiation and postponed maximum growth rate in late maturing crops.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
Interspecific interactionse0
Outcome
temporal niche differentiatione0
Direction
amplifiede0
Qualifier
postponement of the time taken to reach maximum daily growth rate of late-maturing cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interspecific interactions between intercropped species amplified temporal niche differentiation as indicated by postponement of the time taken to reach maximum daily growth rate of late-maturing crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–1030 · show in text ↑
e1

“four intercropping systems (oilseed rape/maize, oilseed rape/soybean, potato/maize, and soybean/potato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–368 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum daily growth rate timing in maize associated with oilseed rape was postponed by 21 to 41 days.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
time taken to reach maximum daily growth ratee0
Direction
postponemente0
Value
21 to 41 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postponement of the time taken to reach maximum daily growth rate of late-maturing crops (i.e. 21 to 41 days in maize associated with oilseed rape or potato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1099 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum daily growth rate timing in maize associated with potato was postponed by 21 to 41 days.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
time taken to reach maximum daily growth ratee0
Direction
postponemente0
Value
21 to 41 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postponement of the time taken to reach maximum daily growth rate of late-maturing crops (i.e. 21 to 41 days in maize associated with oilseed rape or potato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1099 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After oilseed rape harvest, intercropped maize growth trajectories recovered to monoculture values per plant.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Growth trajectoriese0
Direction
recoverede0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth trajectories of intercropped maize or soybean recovered after the oilseed rape harvest to the same values as in their monoculture on a per plant basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1258 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After oilseed rape harvest, intercropped soybean growth trajectories recovered to monoculture values per plant.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
Growth trajectoriese0
Direction
recoverede0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth trajectories of intercropped maize or soybean recovered after the oilseed rape harvest to the same values as in their monoculture on a per plant basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1258 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amplified niche differentiation depended on neighboring species identity and its relative growth rate.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Outcome
niche differentiatione0
Qualifier
identity of neighboring speciese0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amplified niche differentiation between crop species depends on the identity of neighboring species whose relative growth rate is crucial in determining the differentiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1432 · show in text ↑
e1

“four intercropping systems (oilseed rape/maize, oilseed rape/soybean, potato/maize, and soybean/potato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–368 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

30 papers: 20 positive, 10 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

intercropping · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 41 positive, 13 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

218 papers: 131 positive, 87 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

214 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.