Intervention effectmodel-written summary

soybean/potato intercropping showed significant yield advantage.

A claim from Temporal Differentiation of Crop Growth as One of the Drivers of Intercropping Yield Advantage · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

soybean/potato intercropping showed significant yield advantage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
yield advantagese0
Direction
advantagese0
Qualifier
soybean/potatoe0
Comparator
corresponding monoculturese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four intercropping systems (oilseed rape/maize, oilseed rape/soybean, potato/maize, and soybean/potato) and the corresponding monocultures. Total dry matter data collected every 20 d after maize emergence were fitted to logistic models to investigate the temporal dynamics of crop growth and interspecific interactions. All four intercropping systems showed significant yield advantages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–651

Title

Temporal Differentiation of Crop Growth as One of the Drivers of Intercropping Yield Advantage

Nan Dong; Ming-Ming Tang; Wei-Ping Zhang; et al. Scientific Reports 2018. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21414-w

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-cfcb9ce564ec5bf4eab4af446a6e69bfc97af0f03ad661ed4c6fe8d6c44d12b1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

218 papers: 131 positive, 87 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this claim · 79 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

209 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.