Claim · model-written summary
Cutting on 2 July yielded 63.5 g/cane.
- Taxon
- red raspberry
_Rubus_idaeus_-_Feuillage.jpg?width=60)
Rubus idaeust0 - Treatment
- July cuttingse0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- acceptablee0
- Value
- 63.5e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Rubus_idaeus_-_Feuillage.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“July cuttings delayed harvest until October to January with acceptable fruit yield (63.5, 52.8, and 26.5 g/cane for 2, 16, and 31 July, respectively).”
t0“Red Raspberry”
Title
Pedro B. Oliveira; Cristina M. Oliveira; Luís Lopes-da-Fonseca; et al. HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.5.805
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect August shoot cutting delayed fruit harvest until February and April.
- Intervention effect The August cuts produced weak shoot growth.
- Intervention effect The first August cut yielded 4.8 g/cane.
- Intervention effect The second August cut yielded 2.1 g/cane.
- Intervention effect July cutting delayed harvest to October through January.
- Intervention effect Cutting on 16 July yielded 52.8 g/cane.
- Intervention effect Cutting on 31 July yielded 26.5 g/cane.
- Intervention effect Cane height and node counts differed little among the three July cutting dates.
- Intervention effect Leaf area per cane decreased from the first to third July cut.
- Intervention effect Fruit yield sharply decreased from the second to third July cut.
- Intervention effect Shoot growth was less affected than yield when cutting was delayed until late July.
- Observation Fruit quality always met acceptable standards.
- Recommendation Summer cutting was found practicable for protected off-season raspberry production in mild winter climates.