Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Early sown, late harvested sugar beet had the highest root yield at 52.53 t ha −1.

A claim from Effects of sowing and harvesting dates on yield and some quality characteristics of crops in sugar beet/cereal rotation system · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sown, late harvested sugar beet had the highest root yield at 52.53 t ha −1.

Treatment
early sown (5 April) and late harvested (1 November)e0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
52.53 t ha −1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest root yield (52.53 t ha −1 ) was obtained from early sown (5 April) and late harvested (1 November) beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–881
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103

Title

Effects of sowing and harvesting dates on yield and some quality characteristics of crops in sugar beet/cereal rotation system

Özden Öztürk; Ali Topal; Fikret Akınerdem; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2007. doi:10.1002/jsfa.3061

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-21939dfa67b336499a8078527403b6a2e366705011bd5966bfd577821fd748fd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sowing time · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.