Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fungicidal sprays increased yield more than insecticidal sprays.

A claim from Influence of Cultivars and Pesticides on Pea Aphid, Spotted Alfalfa Aphid, and Associated Arthropod Taxa in a Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem1,2 · 1976

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicidal sprays increased yield more than insecticidal sprays.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Fungicidal sprayse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greater yield increasese0
Comparator
insecticidal sprayse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–137
e0

“Fungicidal sprays resulted in greater yield increases than did insecticidal sprays; combinations were additive in effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–674

Title

Influence of Cultivars and Pesticides on Pea Aphid, Spotted Alfalfa Aphid, and Associated Arthropod Taxa in a Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem1,2

E. B. Radcliffe; R. W. Weires; R. E. Stucker; et al. Environmental Entomology 1976. doi:10.1093/ee/5.6.1195

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-21fb716635021854faad5c83b230acdb3651430a81a55143cd825f58575f14f2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fungicide · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 31 positive, 7 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.