Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The metolachlor at 1.5 and bentazone sequence selectively controlled named weeds in groundnut.

A claim from Weed control in groundnut in irrigation projects in Nigerian Savanna · 1983

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The metolachlor at 1.5 and bentazone sequence selectively controlled named weeds in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
metolachlor at 1.5e1
Interactor
Cyperus esculentus L.Cyperus esculentuse1weed
Second interactor
Cyperus tuberosus Rottb.e1weed
Outcome
selective control of Cyperus esculentus L., Cyperus tuberosus Rottb. and annual grass and broadleaved weedse1
Qualifier
annual grass and broadleaved weedse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cyperus esculentus
Cyperus esculentus · InteractorUser:Blahedo · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rainfed groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–112
e1

“Alachlor at 3.0 and metolachlor at 1.5 and 3.0 kg a.i./ha applied pre‐emergence and followed by bentazone at 1.5 kg a.i./ha 3–4 weeks after sowing gave selective control of Cyperus esculentus L., Cyperus tuberosus Rottb. and annual grass and broadleaved weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–622

Title

Weed control in groundnut in irrigation projects in Nigerian Savanna

A. H. Choudhary Tropical Pest Management 1983. doi:10.1080/09670878309370816

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-2298fe7b93c19a01328d730eea1862b03c0d7b770209ad6d1bdbdd29d9f68984 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

metolachlor · Cyperus esculentus · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.