Claim · model-written summary
The optimum NIRS equation gave a validation error of 14.2 g kg −1.
- Taxon
- tall fescue
Lolium arundinaceumt0 - Outcome
- validation (SEP)e0
- Value
- 14.2 g kg −1e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“standard errors of calibration (SEC) and validation (SEP) of 14.4 and 14.2 g kg −1 , respectively”
t0“Pasture mixtures of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) and tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”
Title
Ash in Forage, Esophageal, and Fecal Samples Analyzed Using Near‐Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy
W. R. Windham; N. S. Hill; J. A. Stuedemann Crop Science 1991. doi:10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183x003100050053x
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Method / resource The optimum NIRS equation gave a calibration error of 14.4 g kg −1.
- Observation Selected equations had three wavelength pairs within 40 nm.
- Method / resource Forced wavelength equations had validation errors no different from the original equation.
- Recommendation The authors concluded wavelength pairs were necessary for spectral slope differences.
- Method / resource Recalibration with pasture and esophageal samples improved SEC to 9.5 g kg −1.
- Method / resource Recalibration with pasture and esophageal samples improved SEP to 9.8 g kg −1.
- Method / resource Recalibration with fecal samples improved SEC to 10.6 g kg −1.
- Method / resource Recalibration with fecal samples improved SEP to 12.7 g kg −1.