Claim · model-written summary
Integrated cotton flow measurements predicted load mass with mean error of 4.0 percent.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Outcome
- actual load massese0
- Value
- 4.0percente0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Integrated flow ratemeasurements consistently predicted actual load masses with a mean error magnitude of 4.0percent”
t0“Cotton Yield Mapping”
Title
Development and Evaluation of a Flow Measurement Device for Cotton Yield Mapping
John B. Wilkerson; F. Henry Moody; William E. Hart 2001 Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1,2001 2001. doi:10.13031/2013.5522
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Method / resource Debris accumulation on sensor faces did not degrade performance across harvest seasons.
- Association Average cotton flow rate had no significant effect on load prediction errors.
- Association Cotton moisture content had no significant effect on load prediction errors.
- Association Time since calibration had no significant effect on load prediction errors.
- Association Cotton variety significantly affected load prediction errors.
- Recommendation The authors recommend checking calibration when the harvested cotton variety changes.