Claim · model-written summary
Debris accumulation on sensor faces did not degrade performance across harvest seasons.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Outcome
- Performance degradatione0
- Direction
- not observede0
- Comparator
- the sensors were never cleanedduring any of the harvest seasonse1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Performance degradation due to debrisaccumulation on sensor faces was not observed”
e1“the sensors were never cleanedduring any of the harvest seasons”
t0“Cotton Yield Mapping”
Title
Development and Evaluation of a Flow Measurement Device for Cotton Yield Mapping
John B. Wilkerson; F. Henry Moody; William E. Hart 2001 Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1,2001 2001. doi:10.13031/2013.5522
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Method / resource Integrated cotton flow measurements predicted load mass with mean error of 4.0 percent.
- Association Average cotton flow rate had no significant effect on load prediction errors.
- Association Cotton moisture content had no significant effect on load prediction errors.
- Association Time since calibration had no significant effect on load prediction errors.
- Association Cotton variety significantly affected load prediction errors.
- Recommendation The authors recommend checking calibration when the harvested cotton variety changes.