Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SA improved quality of Jerusalem artichoke under drought stress.

A claim from EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS SALICYLIC ACID ON THE RESPONSE OF SNAP BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) AND JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE (Helianthus tuberosus L.) TO DROUGHT STRESS · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA improved quality of Jerusalem artichoke under drought stress.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
Foliar application of SAe0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
drought stresse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of SA improved growth, productivity, quality as well as some physiological parameters of snap bean and Jerusalem artichoke plants exposed to drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–803
t0

“SNAP BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) AND JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE (Helianthus tuberosus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–137

Title

EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS SALICYLIC ACID ON THE RESPONSE OF SNAP BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) AND JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE (Helianthus tuberosus L.) TO DROUGHT STRESS

Wael Abdel-Kader El-Tohamy; Hamed Maher El-Abagy; Mohammed Abd Allah Badr; et al. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 2018. doi:10.24326/asphc.2018.4.8

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-245ee02bae7db7dea19461a2efd8abaae11748b105f9d01dbcb9e855d0858620 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

application · quality: general · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.