Claim · model-written summary
Petiole fresh mass versus lamina fresh mass scaling had more robust regression fit than petiole fresh mass versus area scaling.
- Taxon
- nine Lauraceae speciest0
- Outcome
- PFM vs. FM scaling relationshipe0
- Comparator
- PFM vs. A scaling relationshipe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“The PFM vs. FM scaling relationship was statistically more robust than the PFM vs. A scaling relationship”
t0“nine Lauraceae species”
Title
Yirong Li; Peijian Shi; Ülo Niinemets; et al. American Journal of Botany 2022. doi:10.1002/ajb2.1812
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Association Fresh lamina mass showed diminishing returns relative to lamina area.
- Association Dry lamina mass showed diminishing returns relative to lamina area.
- Association Fresh mass versus area scaling had more robust regression fit than dry mass versus area scaling.
- Association Petiole fresh mass versus lamina fresh mass showed diminishing returns.
- Association Petiole fresh mass versus lamina area showed diminishing returns.
- Mechanism The authors interpret petiole scaling as stronger with lamina mass than area, favoring static over wind loading.