Claim · model-written summary
P-Ca did not positively affect return bloom in 2014/2015.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
t0“‘Smith’ pear trees”
e0“In 2014/2015 season, P-Ca applications positively affected yield components, except average fruit weight and return bloom.”
Title
Bruno Carra; Daniel Spagnol; Everton Sozo de Abreu; et al. Bragantia 2017. doi:10.1590/1678-4499.298
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect P-Ca controlled vegetative growth in both seasons at different rates.
- Intervention effect P-Ca did not affect yield components in 2013/2014 apart from return bloom and return yield.
- Intervention effect P-Ca affected return bloom in 2013/2014.
- Intervention effect P-Ca affected return yield in 2013/2014.
- Intervention effect P-Ca positively affected yield components in 2014/2015, apart from average fruit weight and return bloom.
- Intervention effect P-Ca did not positively affect average fruit weight in 2014/2015.
- Intervention effect P-Ca did not change fruit qualitative attributes at harvest or after cold storage.
- Recommendation The authors propose P-Ca to manage Smith pear vigor in southern Brazil.