Claim · model-written summary
F. commune isolates had no detected DNA polymorphisms.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Interactor
- F. communeFusarium communee0pathogen
- Outcome
- No DNA polymorphisms were detectede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No DNA polymorphisms were detected in the isolates of F. redolens or F. commune”
t0“tomato”
Title
V. Edel‐Hermann; N. Gautheron; C. Steinberg Plant Pathology 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02551.x
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Algerian isolates included 27 F. oxysporum.
- Observation Algerian isolates included 18 F. commune.
- Observation Algerian isolates included three F. redolens.
- Observation All tested isolates were pathogenic on tomato.
- Association Tomato disease incidence was greater at 28°C than 24°C.
- Observation F. redolens isolates had no detected DNA polymorphisms.
- Observation The Algerian F. oxysporum isolates comprised nine IGS types.
- Observation The Algerian F. oxysporum isolates comprised 13 VCGs, including potentially new groups.
- Observation The 27 isolates were assigned to FORL because none tested SIX1 positive.
- Observation Tunisian isolates were highly diverse and genetically distinct from Algerian isolates.
- Observation Several Tunisian isolates were identified as FOL through SIX1 detection.
- Association European isolates were less diverse than Tunisian isolates.
- Observation The authors suggest emergent Algerian pathogenic forms may have evolved from local nonpathogenic populations.