Claim · model-written summary
Among thinners, there was no relationship between inhibition of leaf NCER and thinning efficacy.
- Taxon
- Sweet Cherry
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- thinnerse0
- Outcome
- thinning efficacye0
- Qualifier
- no relationship between inhibition of leaf NCER and thinning efficacye0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among thinners, there was no relationship between inhibition of leaf NCER and thinning efficacy”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Title
Physiological and Horticultural Effects of Sweet Cherry Chemical Blossom Thinners
Olivia M. Lenahan; Matthew D. Whiting HortScience 2006. doi:10.21273/hortsci.41.7.1547
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect FOLS suppressed leaf net CO2 exchange rate by 33% over a recovery period directly after the 80% full bloom treatment.
- Intervention effect Tergitol suppressed leaf net CO2 exchange rate by 30%.
- Intervention effect VOE suppressed leaf net CO2 exchange rate by 28%.
- Intervention effect ATS suppressed leaf net CO2 exchange rate by 18%.
- Intervention effect Leaf NCER recovered fully from every thinning treatment.
- Association Reductions in leaf NCER were unrelated to stomatal conductance (g S).
- Intervention effect VOE reduced estimated leaf chlorophyll content the most, by 11% overall for 23 days after treatment.
- Intervention effect All blossom thinners reduced constant fluorescence (Fo).
- Intervention effect No thinning agent reduced fruit set or yield in 2004.
- Intervention effect ATS reduced fruit set in 2005.
- Intervention effect FOLS reduced fruit set in 2005.
- Intervention effect Tergitol reduced fruit set in 2005.
- Intervention effect VOE was ineffective as a blossom thinner.
- Intervention effect VOE exhibited significant leaf phytotoxicity.