Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Lateral root number increased under elevated CO2 in all three species.

A claim from Elevated CO2 and tree root growth: contrasting responses in Fraxinus excelsior, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lateral root number increased under elevated CO2 in all three species.

Taxon
Fraxinus excelsior L., Quercus petraea . L. and Pinus sylvestris L.Pinus sylvestrisQuercus petraeaFraxinus excelsiore0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
Lateral root numbere6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Quercus petraea
Quercus petraea · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryStefan.lefnaer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fraxinus excelsior
Fraxinus excelsior · TaxonWillow · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth and respiration in elevated CO 2 (700 μmol mol −1 ) was studied in three tree species, Fraxinus excelsior L., Quercus petraea . L. and Pinus sylvestris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166
e6

“Lateral root number was increased in elevated CO 2 for all species, as was mean root diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1990–2083

Title

Elevated CO2 and tree root growth: contrasting responses in Fraxinus excelsior, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris

MEG CROOKSHANKS; GAIL TAYLOR; MARK BROADMEADOW New Phytologist 1998. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00109.x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-27720f0fa8fd4fcb2edc3b078f3be0fdfa710dee385fce2d5258bf2645647edd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

co2 · growth · Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

co2 · growth · Fraxinus excelsior (European ash)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

co2 · growth · Quercus petraea (sessile oak)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.