Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zinc and boron sprays improved guava fruit growth, yield and quality versus water spray.

A claim from Effect of Foliar Application of Zinc and Boron on Fruit Growth, Yield and Quality of Winter Season Guava (Psidium guajava L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc and boron sprays improved guava fruit growth, yield and quality versus water spray.

Taxon
guava (Psidium guajava L.)Psidium guajavat0
Treatment
Zn and Boe0
Outcome
fruit growth, yield and quality traitse0
Direction
much bettere0
Comparator
control of water spraye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–125
e0

“treated plants with Zn and Bo performed significantly much better than control of water spray in fruit growth, yield and quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–534

Title

Effect of Foliar Application of Zinc and Boron on Fruit Growth, Yield and Quality of Winter Season Guava (Psidium guajava L.)

Dewanshu Baranwal; Saurabh Tomar; Jagendra Pratap Singh; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.186

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-289abe35dc49d12e32a3498b63599fee7d766bc11c2104fc58d3ecb080fd4ba8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · quality: general · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.