Claim · model-written summary
AAV-H had no effect on grain yield in the other lots.
- Taxon
- barley and wheat
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgare
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- AAV-He6
- Outcome
- grain yielde6
- Direction
- no effecte6
- Qualifier
- in the other lotse6
- Comparator
- control (no treatment)e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“to control Fusarium graminearum ( Fg ) and Bipolaris sorokiniana ( Bs ), two seed-borne pathogens affecting emergence and yield in barley and wheat”
e1“These treatments were compared with a control (no treatment)”
e6“AAV-H had no effect on grain yield in the other lots, and neither did the other treatments in any of the lots”
Title
Sylvie Rioux; Stéphan Pouleur; Paul Randall; et al. Phytoprotection 2016. doi:10.7202/1037531ar
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect The three non-chemical treatments reduced Fusarium graminearum contamination rate under the 15% rejection threshold in all Fg-contaminated lots.
- Intervention effect AAV-H reduced Bipolaris sorokiniana contamination the most of the treatments in barley and wheat lots.
- Intervention effect Dry heat had no effect on Bipolaris sorokiniana contamination in barley.
- Intervention effect AAV-L reduced Bipolaris sorokiniana contamination, less than AAV-H.
- Intervention effect The treatments did not reduce Bipolaris sorokiniana contamination under the 30% threshold, except AAV-H in one barley lot and dry heat in one wheat lot.
- Intervention effect AAV-H reduced germination in three wheat lots.
- Intervention effect AAV-H reduced germination in the hulless barley AC Hawkeye.
- Intervention effect AAV-H had negative effects on grain yield in two wheat lots.
- Intervention effect The other treatments had no effect on grain yield in any lot.
- Intervention effect Dry heat was effective for controlling Fusarium graminearum in both cereals.
- Observation AAV-H showed some potential to control both pathogens, but only in covered grains.
- Recommendation The authors conclude that none of the evaluated treatments is appropriate for reducing contamination by either pathogen in wheat and barley.