Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Poultry manure gave the higher mean tuber weight of 2.34 kg.

A claim from Comparative Effect of Organic and In-Organic Fertilizer Treatment on the Growth and Tuberyeild of Sweet Potato (Ipomea Batata L) · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure gave the higher mean tuber weight of 2.34 kg.

Taxon
Sweet Potato (Ipomea Batata L)Ipomoea batatast0
Treatment
poultry manure applicatione0
Outcome
tuber weighte1
Direction
highere0
Value
2.34kge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“poultry manure application had the higher mean value of (2.34kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1223
e1

“tuber weight was not significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1153
t0

“Sweet Potato (Ipomea Batata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–128

Title

Comparative Effect of Organic and In-Organic Fertilizer Treatment on the Growth and Tuberyeild of Sweet Potato (Ipomea Batata L)

Adeyeye A S; Akanbi W B; Sobola O O; et al. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research 2016. doi:10.18488/journal.70/2016.3.3/70.3.54.57

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-29c1c2de3eb2ddfb77ccc2506fb8735784c94351b8bfbed8ce1d8329cd515312 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 126 positive, 19 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

136 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.