Claim · model-written summary
Net returns varied with location and row pattern.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- row patterne0
- Outcome
- Net returnse0
- Setting
- locatione0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Net returns varied by location and row pattern.”
t0“Cotton”
Title
Cotton response to row pattern and plant density: Part I—Development and yield
William J. Rutland; Brian K. Pieralisi; Darrin M. Dodds; et al. Agronomy Journal 2025. doi:10.1002/agj2.70132
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Skip rows and low density reduced plant height.
- Intervention effect Higher density reduced total nodes and nodes above cracked boll.
- Association Yield showed location-by-year-by-pattern and year-by-density interactions.
- Intervention effect Solid rows yielded more in three of four site years.
- Intervention effect Pooled yield was unaffected by row pattern or density.
- Intervention effect Skip rows gave higher net returns in Stoneville.
- Intervention effect Solid planting gave higher net returns in Starkville.
- Intervention effect Increasing density did not raise profit margin because seed costs increased.