Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mid-season irrigation improved yield.

A claim from Irrigation Timing and Rate Affect Cotton Boll Distribution and Fiber Quality · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-season irrigation improved yield.

Treatment
Mid‐ and late‐season irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mid‐ and late‐season irrigation improved yield and fiber quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1296
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40

Title

Irrigation Timing and Rate Affect Cotton Boll Distribution and Fiber Quality

Curtis R. Schaefer; Glen L. Ritchie; James P. Bordovsky; et al. Agronomy Journal 2018. doi:10.2134/agronj2017.06.0360

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2a3cebf822dbc082b3ac7b263385cb4c3e31b53460ceaa17cdacc463921d5ffe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this claim · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
    Excess early irrigation sometimes reduced yield.

    Cotton Irrigation Timing with Variable Seasonal Irrigation Capacities in the Texas South Plains · 2015 · compared with treatments with limited or no early irrigations

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

390 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.