Observationmodel-written summary

Aphids did not desert Washington, supporting antibiosis resistance.

A claim from Evidence for Nonpreference and Antibiosis in Aphid-resistant Red Raspberry Cultivars12 · 1974

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids did not desert Washington, supporting antibiosis resistance.

Taxon
Red Raspberry CultivarsRubus idaeust0
Material
Washingtone0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphids did not deserte0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aphids did not desert the cultivar Washington, thus supporting the conclusion that resistance in this case operates as antibiosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–989
t0

“Red Raspberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84

Title

Evidence for Nonpreference and Antibiosis in Aphid-resistant Red Raspberry Cultivars12

G. G. Kennedy; G. A. Schaefers Environmental Entomology 1974. doi:10.1093/ee/3.5.773

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2b63f38952d80eedd268033775db345d6c1aced9ffcf72f5d41b7e363dadae18 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer