Claim · model-written summary
Aphid development was slow on Canby and Washington.
- Taxon
- Red Raspberry Cultivars
_Rubus_idaeus_-_Feuillage.jpg?width=60)
Rubus idaeust0 - Material
- Canbye0
- Interactor
- Amphorophora agathonica Hottes
Amphorophora agathonicae1peste0 - Outcome
- Developmente0
- Direction
- slowe0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Rubus_idaeus_-_Feuillage.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Development was slow on Canby and Washington, while developmental time on Malling Exploit was comparable to the susceptible Latham”
t0“Red Raspberry Cultivars”
e1“The survival, developmental time, and reproductive rates of Amphorophora agathonica Hottes were measured in the laboratory on 4 red raspberry cultivars”
Title
Evidence for Nonpreference and Antibiosis in Aphid-resistant Red Raspberry Cultivars12
G. G. Kennedy; G. A. Schaefers Environmental Entomology 1974. doi:10.1093/ee/3.5.773
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Aphid mortality ranked Canby above Malling Exploit, Washington and Latham.
- Observation Aphid mortality was early instar on Canby and Malling Exploit but spread over instars on Washington.
- Observation Aphid developmental time on Malling Exploit resembled Latham.
- Observation Aphid fecundity was lowest on Canby, then Washington, with Malling Exploit equaling Latham.
- Observation Prereproductive adults from Canby weighed significantly less than those from Latham.
- Observation Prereproductive adults from Washington weighed significantly less than those from Latham.
- Observation Aphids deserted Canby in no-choice conditions, consistent with nonpreference.
- Observation Aphids deserted Malling Exploit in no-choice conditions, consistent with nonpreference.
- Observation Aphids did not desert Washington, supporting antibiosis resistance.