Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mepiquat chloride at 75 g a.i./ha increased bolls per plant compared with control and de-topping.

A claim from Dataset of source-sink manipulation through growth retardant for enhancing productivity and profitability of cotton in north west, India · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride at 75 g a.i./ha increased bolls per plant compared with control and de-topping.

Treatment
MC 75 g active ingredient per hectare (a.i./ha)e1
Outcome
bolls per plante1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
control and de-topping treatmentse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“application of MC 75 g active ingredient per hectare (a.i./ha) irrespective of splits between 60 and 90 days after sowing (DAS) was effective for significant reduction in plant height, increase in bolls per plant as compared to control and de-topping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–754
t0

“profitability of cotton in north west, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–136

Title

Dataset of source-sink manipulation through growth retardant for enhancing productivity and profitability of cotton in north west, India

Harjeet Singh Brar; Deepak Kumar; Paramjit Singh Data in Brief 2020. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105914

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2ba3ca9c1e52ebb25180838b6fd97d041d056e741847405fe53260a8ce425eaa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

mepiquat chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 59 positive, 11 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 67 positive, 11 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.