Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Proline alone did not change bean seedling growth.

A claim from Effect of NaCl and Proline on Bean Seedlings Cultured in vitro · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline alone did not change bean seedling growth.

Taxon
beane1
Treatment
Prolinee0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
did not changee0
Comparator
control seedlingse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Proline added to control seedlings did not change seedling growth but decreased chlorophyll and increased protein contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–359
e1

“of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Kizilhaç) seedlings in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–184

Title

Effect of NaCl and Proline on Bean Seedlings Cultured in vitro

Y. Demir; I. Kocaçalişkan Biologia Plantarum 2002. doi:10.1023/a:1022343101727

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-2baaf39ea608cdce053f0a450bdf450c7b5563f87ca6e733a748d50466b156db · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

proline · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.