Observationmodel-written summary

Soybean had lower stomatal density and assimilation than cotton.

A claim from Adaptive Responses of Soybean and Cotton to Water Stress: I. Transpiration Changes in Relation to Stomatal Area and Stomatal Conductance · 2005

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean had lower stomatal density and assimilation than cotton.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
stomatal density and Ane0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
cottone0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with cotton, soybean showed a lower flow rate of stem sap (FRSS), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), stomatal density and An”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–350
t0

“Soybean and Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40

Title

Adaptive Responses of Soybean and Cotton to Water Stress: I. Transpiration Changes in Relation to Stomatal Area and Stomatal Conductance

Inamullah; Akihiro Isoda Plant Production Science 2005. doi:10.1626/pps.8.16

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-2bcc7bbcfd9bfcb58e81b56d92ed596994f4f8038820db2f1a0ce4d379b43f42 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer