Intervention effectmodel-written summary

grain moisture content of plants bent 2 weeks before PM was lower than in unbent plants

A claim from Beneficial effects of bending maize plants at physiological maturity on lodging and on some pre-harvest grain quality parameters · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

grain moisture content of plants bent 2 weeks before PM was lower than in unbent plants

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
cv. Aburotiae0
Treatment
plants bent 2 weeks before PMe2
Outcome
Grain moisture contente1
Direction
lowere1
Value
23.3e2
Comparator
unbent plantse2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize plants (cv. Aburotia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–41
e1

“Grain moisture content, cob infestation with adult insects, and extent of lodging were, at harvest, significantly lower (P=0.05) in bent plants than in unbent ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–704
e2

“Moisture content of grains from plants bent 2 weeks before PM, at PM, and 2 weeks after PM, for example, were, at harvest, 23.3, 25.3, and 31.7 per cent, respectively, compared to 38.3 per cent recorded for unbent plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–996

Title

Beneficial effects of bending maize plants at physiological maturity on lodging and on some pre-harvest grain quality parameters

RT Awuah Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 1998. doi:10.4314/gjas.v31i2.1927

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-2bd22797182db9e0f67429f0651a7ceaffd86b4a4838e90d3b9cdecde106a2e3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

stage · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.