Paper · 1975 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG WHOLE-PLANT MOISTURE, GRAIN MOISTURE, DRY MATTER YIELD, AND QUALITY OF WHOLE-PLANT CORN SILAGE

T. B. DAYNARD; R. B. HUNTER

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
64
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Identical experiments were conducted at the Elora Research Station, near Guelph, Ontario in 1970 and 1971 with the objective of determining the relationships among whole-plant dry matter (DM) yield, whole-plant moisture content, and grain moisture content of corn (Zea mays L.) during the later part of the growing season. Each experiment involved eight commercial hybrids representative of the range in maturity, endosperm type, lodging resistance, and grain yield potential of corn hybrids grown commercially in central Ontario. The hybrids were sampled at weekly intervals over an 8-wk period beginning approximately 1 September; the sampled plants were divided into their leaf, stalk, husk, ear and grain components and oven-dried. Fresh and dry weights were used to calculate dry matter (DM) yields and "at harvest" moisture contents of the various components, and of the entire plant. Averaged across the eight hybrids, maximum DM yield was attained at whole-plant moisture content of 66–70%, and a grain moisture content of 45–50%. Among hybrids, 66% whole-plant moisture corresponded to a range in grain moisture content from 41 to 47%. Two additional experiments were grown also at Elora in 1970 and 1971 to evaluate the effects of harvest date on the DM yield and in vitro digestibility of corn plants and their component plant parts. Each experiment involved four representative commercial hybrids which were sampled at four equal time intervals during the month of September, and divided into grain, cob, husks (including shank) and stover (including leaves, leaf sheaths, stalks and tassels) for dry weight and in vitro digestibility measurement. Whole-plant DM digestibility was essentially constant over a range of whole-plant moisture from 76 to 56% in 1970, and from 76 to 64% in 1971. The consistency of whole-plant digestibility was the result of compensating changes in component yield and digestibility. A decrease in the digestibility of the stover, husks and cob with delayed harvest was compensated for by an increase in the proportion of grain in the whole-plant yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum corn dry matter yield was attained at 66–70% whole-plant moisture and 45–50% grain moisture.

Outcome
maximum DM yielde1
Qualifier
whole-plant moisture content of 66–70%, and a grain moisture content of 45–50%e1
Setting
Elora Research Statione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain moisture content of corn (Zea mays L.) during the later part of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–321 · show in text ↑
e1

“Averaged across the eight hybrids, maximum DM yield was attained at whole-plant moisture content of 66–70%, and a grain moisture content of 45–50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1037 · show in text ↑
e2

“Identical experiments were conducted at the Elora Research Station, near Guelph, Ontario in 1970 and 1971”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among hybrids, 66% whole-plant moisture corresponded to grain moisture content from 41 to 47%.

Treatment
66% whole-plant moisturee3
Outcome
grain moisture contente3
Value
from 41 to 47%e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain moisture content of corn (Zea mays L.) during the later part of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–321 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among hybrids, 66% whole-plant moisture corresponded to a range in grain moisture content from 41 to 47%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant DM digestibility stayed essentially constant over a range of whole-plant moisture from 76 to 56% in 1970.

Outcome
Whole-plant DM digestibilitye4
Qualifier
essentially constant over a range of whole-plant moisture from 76 to 56% in 1970e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain moisture content of corn (Zea mays L.) during the later part of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–321 · show in text ↑
e4

“Whole-plant DM digestibility was essentially constant over a range of whole-plant moisture from 76 to 56% in 1970, and from 76 to 64% in 1971”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed harvest decreased the digestibility of stover, husks and cob.

Treatment
delayed harveste5
Outcome
digestibility of the stover, husks and cobe5
Direction
decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain moisture content of corn (Zea mays L.) during the later part of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–321 · show in text ↑
e5

“A decrease in the digestibility of the stover, husks and cob with delayed harvest was compensated for by an increase in the proportion of grain in the whole-plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–2093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed harvest increased the proportion of grain in the whole-plant yield, compensating for the lower digestibility.

Treatment
delayed harveste5
Outcome
proportion of grain in the whole-plant yielde5
Direction
increasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain moisture content of corn (Zea mays L.) during the later part of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–321 · show in text ↑
e5

“A decrease in the digestibility of the stover, husks and cob with delayed harvest was compensated for by an increase in the proportion of grain in the whole-plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–2093 · show in text ↑

stage · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

stage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 41 positive, 57 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.