Observationmodel-written summary

Chloroplasts smaller than wild type appeared no better for field photosynthetic efficiency and productivity.

A claim from Is chloroplast size optimal for photosynthetic efficiency? · 2023

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloroplasts smaller than wild type appeared no better for field photosynthetic efficiency and productivity.

Material
chloroplast smaller than WTe0
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiency and productivitye0
Direction
no bettere0
Comparator
WTe0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chloroplast smaller than WT appeared to be no better than WT for photosynthetic efficiency and productivity under field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1279
t0

“Several tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum ) lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–381

Title

Is chloroplast size optimal for photosynthetic efficiency?

Katarzyna Głowacka; Johannes Kromdijk; Coralie E. Salesse‐Smith; et al. New Phytologist 2023. doi:10.1111/nph.19091

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-2c71fcac40d96a1227d114073247a403d8154c9326d50b87cb88519b0c6d65b2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer