Claim · model-written summary
Disk ripper cultivation yielded 5.55 t/ha winter wheat.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0 - Treatment
- disk rippere0
- Outcome
- harvest resultse0
- Value
- 5.55e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both disk ripper and conventional disc cultivation showed nearly the same harvest results (5.55 or 5.5 t/ha)”
t0“corn”
Title
Evaluation of reduced tillage technologies in corn production based on soil and crop analyses
Attila Megyes; Tamás Rátonyi; János Nagy; et al. Acta Agraria Debreceniensis 2001. doi:10.34101/actaagrar/2/3599
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage improved soil looseness and moisture relative to conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect No-till produced lower corn yield and production elements than winter plough or disk ripper.
- Intervention effect Shallow spring tillage produced lower corn yield and production elements than winter plough or disk ripper.
- Intervention effect No-till with simultaneous clearing and sowing best preserved soil moisture.
- Observation No-till yielded surplus soil moisture equivalent to 40 mm precipitation.
- Intervention effect Tillage method did not affect winter wheat yield.
- Observation Conventional disc cultivation yielded 5.5 t/ha winter wheat.
- Intervention effect Winter plough and disk ripper had no significant difference in corn production.
- Intervention effect No-till yield was 9-10% below winter plough and disk ripper yields.
- Intervention effect Shallow spring tillage produced the lowest yield.
- Intervention effect Winter tillage yielded 1.1 t/ha (13%) more maize than disk ripper.
- Intervention effect Winter tillage yielded 1.9-2.1 t/ha (23-25%) more maize than direct sowing and cultivator treatments.
- Intervention effect Direct sowing and cultivator treatment yields did not differ significantly.