Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ripper tillage gave the highest mean maize yield, 10.14 t ha-1, compared with mouldboard and strip tillage.

A claim from Effect of tillage practices, fertilizer treatments and crop rotation on yield of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ripper tillage gave the highest mean maize yield, 10.14 t ha-1, compared with mouldboard and strip tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ripper tillage (RT)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.14 t ha-1e0
Comparator
mouldboard tillage (MT) and strip tillage (ST)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ripper tillage (RT) had the highest average yield (10.14 t ha-1) followed by mouldboard tillage (MT) and strip tillage (ST)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–676
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–100

Title

Effect of tillage practices, fertilizer treatments and crop rotation on yield of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids

Karamchand Bramdeo; Tamás Rátonyi Acta Agraria Debreceniensis 2020. doi:10.34101/actaagrar/2/3626

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-2d0cfb4c98d0e2f05c5fc0a30ad4d188746b4605795c11ba290a341ebda038ed · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.