Claim · model-written summary
SPAD management gave a net return of Rs. 52970.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“SPAD (Rs. 52970)”
Title
Saurabh Tyagi; AP Garg; Prashant Ahlawat; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2021
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect FIRB significantly increased grains per spike, spike length, spikelets per spike and test weight.
- Intervention effect FIRB improved grain yield by 28.9% over roto tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage improved grain yield by 23.2% over roto tillage.
- Intervention effect FIRB increased water productivity by 29.2% over conventional, reduced and roto tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage increased water productivity by 16.2% over conventional, reduced and roto tillage.
- Intervention effect Targeted yield and SPAD strategies gave significantly higher nitrogen and potassium partial factor productivity.
- Intervention effect Target yield nitrogen management gave significantly higher agronomic efficiency, apparent recovery and physiological efficiency.
- Intervention effect SPAD was associated with higher nitrogen physiological efficiency.
- Intervention effect SPAD and LCC nitrogen management gave significantly higher yield attributes and grain yield than other strategies.
- Observation Zero tillage wheat had the highest net return of Rs.54685 among planting systems.
- Observation Targeted yield management gave maximum net return of Rs.58865.
- Observation Targeted yield management had the highest benefit cost ratio of 1.75.
- Observation SPAD benefit cost ratio was 1.65.
- Observation Control had the lowest benefit cost ratio of 1.07.
- Recommendation The authors recommend FIRB and zero tillage with targeted yield or SPAD nitrogen management.