Claim · model-written summary
Park phytocenosis was assigned aesthetic class II.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“the phytocenosis of the park is classified as class II”
t0“plantings of the settlement park”
Title
O. E. Ivanchenko; V. P. Bessonova Питання степового лісознавства та лісової рекультивації земель 2020. doi:10.15421/442003
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Observation The park contains 438 trees belonging to 32 species.
- Observation Robinia pseudoacacia represents 25% of park trees.
- Observation Acer platanoides represents 11.19% of park trees.
- Observation Acer negundo represents 10.05% of park trees.
- Observation Aesculus hippocastunum was present in sufficient quantities.
- Observation Aceraceae had four species.
- Observation Salicaceae had four species.
- Observation Ulmaceae had three species.
- Observation Blooming decorative trees made up 52,25 % of park plants.
- Observation The park biodiversity index was 11,74, high relative to other regional parks.
- Observation Introduced species made up 71.65% of park trees.
- Observation Some park trees grow in rows and Spiraea vanhouttei in hedgerow groups.
- Observation The most numerous diameter classes were 14,1–18,0, 32,1–38,0, and 38,1–42,0.
- Observation Average trunk diameter was 27 cm.
- Observation Trees 8,1 to 12,0 m tall comprised 52.09%.
- Observation Undamaged trees comprised 51,37%.
- Observation Moderately weakened trees comprised 35,39%.
- Observation No dead-standing trees were detected.
- Observation The woody plant assortment fits soil conditions but only partly fits moisture conditions.