Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The integrated treatment produced maximum nitrogen content of 1.9%.

A claim from INFLUENCE OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON QUALITY, PLANT NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND RESIDUAL SOIL FERTILITY OF FODDER OAT (AVENA SATIVA L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated treatment produced maximum nitrogen content of 1.9%.

Taxon
FODDER OATt0
Treatment
75% RDF (recommended dose of fertilizer) along with 2 t poultry manure ha -1e0
Outcome
nitrogen contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.9%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“FODDER OAT (AVENA SATIVA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–137
e0

“The maximum crude protein content (11.88%) and crude protein yield (10.85 q ha -1 ), nitrogen content (1.9%), potassium content (1.37%), NPK uptake by plant and available NPK in residual soil were recorded in the treatment with the application of 75% RDF (recommended dose of fertilizer) along with 2 t poultry manure ha -1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–874

Title

INFLUENCE OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON QUALITY, PLANT NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND RESIDUAL SOIL FERTILITY OF FODDER OAT (AVENA SATIVA L.)

PLANT ARCHIVES 2025. doi:10.51470/plantarchives.2025.v25.no.1.346

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-2e6caad34ca8e14c7d8d4e477f49affa5e056dfcf729b9cb3a8502fdb3504c79 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 31 positive, 9 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.