Claim · model-written summary
Cotton recovery after terminal injury depended on seasonal growing conditions.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Outcome
- Recoverabilitye0
- Direction
- dependente0
- Setting
- growing conditions from season to seasone0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Recoverability of cotton following terminal injury is dependent on growing conditions from season to season”
Title
Jason Allen Sweeney TigerPrints (Clemson University) 2013
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect WideStrike cotton varieties were up to 11% less tolerant to topical glufosinate than LibertyLink varieties.
- Observation Glufosinate phytotoxicity symptoms were transient.
- Intervention effect Sprayed and unsprayed WideStrike and LibertyLink varieties did not differ in lint yield.
- Intervention effect Glufosinate sprayed cotton yielded 105 kg haø_ more lint than unsprayed cotton.
- Mechanism The authors linked yield increases in sprayed varieties to increased boll development.
- Intervention effect At the 1- to 3-leaf stage, PHY 375WRF had 12, 21, 19 and 29% greater injury than FM 1773LLB2 at 1, 2, 3 and 4x glufosinate rates, respectively.
- Intervention effect At the 7- to 9-leaf stage, PHY 375WRF had 7, 11, 16 and 18% greater injury than FM 1773LLB2 at 1, 2, 3 and 4x rates, respectively.
- Intervention effect At early bloom, PHY 375WRF had 9, 12 and 15% greater injury than FM 1773LLB2 at 1, 2 and 4x rates, respectively.
- Intervention effect Labeled glufosinate rates did not increase total leaf injury of FM 1773LLB2 relative to unsprayed plants.
- Intervention effect Glufosinate application had no effect on total node accumulation or final plant height.
- Association No variety by glufosinate interaction was observed for growth, lint yield or fiber properties.
- Intervention effect Sprayed cotton did not differ in lint yield from untreated control.
- Intervention effect At the 1- to 3-leaf stage, the 3x rate reduced lint yield by 219 kg haˉ_ relative to 1x.
- Intervention effect At the 1- to 3-leaf stage, the 4x rate reduced lint yield by 195 kg haˉ_ relative to 1x.
- Intervention effect At the 7- to 9-leaf stage, 3x glufosinate reduced cotton yield by 235 kg haˉ_ relative to 1x.
- Intervention effect Irrigation did not affect cotton recovery after terminal removal.
- Association Final lint yield after terminal removal did not appear to depend on growing season.
- Intervention effect Terminal removal reduced PHY 499WRF lint yield by 25%, 21%, 17%, 16% and 11% at the listed node and stage treatments versus untreated control.
- Association At a given growth stage, lower terminal removal positions caused greater lint yield reductions.