Claim · model-written summary
The demonstration plot to farmer plot yield gap was 10.38 percent.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Outcome
- yield gape0
- Value
- 10.38 percente0
- Comparator
- actual farmers plot yielde0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“10.38 percent of yield gap between demonstration plot and actual farmers plot yield”
Title
Effect of ICM Practices on Yield and Economics in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)
Ullangula Sravanthi; Rajeshwar Malavath; Shivakrishna Kota; et al. Ecology Environment and Conservation 2023. doi:10.53550/eec.2023.v29i03s.053
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation The gap between potential and actual tomato yield was 52.94 percent.
- Observation The technological yield gap was 42.56 percent.
- Intervention effect Integrated crop management produced the highest yield, 34.46 t ha-1, versus farmer practice at 25.54 t ha-1.
- Intervention effect The T2 benefit cost ratio was 1.56 compared with 1.42 for T1.
- Intervention effect T2 had higher net profit than T1.
- Intervention effect Fruit number, fruit weight and marketable yield were highest under T2 relative to T1.
- Intervention effect Integrated crop management decreased blotchy ripening and sun-scalding incidence.
- Intervention effect Integrated crop management decreased fruit borer incidence.
- Intervention effect Integrated crop management decreased blight infestation.