Paper · 2023 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Effect of ICM Practices on Yield and Economics in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

Ullangula Sravanthi; Rajeshwar Malavath; Shivakrishna Kota; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out to study the effect of integrated crop management practices on yield and economics of tomato at farmer’s field of Mancherial district, Telangana state during the year from 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22. The farming area available for the production of tomato across India during the financial year 2022 is estimated to have amounted to 841 thousand hectares. The treatments consist of farmer practice (T1) with application of RDF (180: 100: 60 kg NPK ha-1) and direct sowing in the field and T2 consists of raising of seedlings by nursery, installation of yellow sticky traps @ 25 ha-1, staking of plants, marigold grown as trap crop (tomato 16 rows: marigold 1 row) and spraying of need-based chemicals along with application of RDF (180: 100: 60 kg NPK ha-1). The results revealed that the total percent yield gap between potential yield and actual yield of tomato was 52.94 percent, in which 10.38 percent of yield gap between demonstration plot and actual farmers plot yield and 42.56 percent of technological gap. The data (T2) showed that highest yield recorded (34.46 t ha-1) in comparison to farmer practice (25.54 t ha-1) (T1), high net prot (T2) over (T1) with BC Ratio 1.56 (T2) and 1.42 (T1). The experiment showed that the number of fruits, fruit weight and marketable yield were highest in T2 (ICM practices) over T1 (application of RDF: 180: 100: 60 kg NPK ha-1). The adoption of ICM practices shows positive impact on yield (34.46 t ha-1) and economics of tomato through adoption of ICM practices and also decreased the incidence of physiological disorders (blotchy ripening, sun-scalding) and pest-disease incidence (fruit borer and blight infestation).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gap between potential and actual tomato yield was 52.94 percent.

Outcome
yield gape0
Value
52.94 percente0
Comparator
potential yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total percent yield gap between potential yield and actual yield of tomato was 52.94 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–925 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The demonstration plot to farmer plot yield gap was 10.38 percent.

Outcome
yield gape0
Value
10.38 percente0
Comparator
actual farmers plot yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“10.38 percent of yield gap between demonstration plot and actual farmers plot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1019 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The technological yield gap was 42.56 percent.

Outcome
technological gape0
Value
42.56 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“42.56 percent of technological gap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated crop management produced the highest yield, 34.46 t ha-1, versus farmer practice at 25.54 t ha-1.

Treatment
T2e1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
34.46 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
25.54 t ha-1e0
Comparator
farmer practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest yield recorded (34.46 t ha-1) in comparison to farmer practice (25.54 t ha-1) (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1176 · show in text ↑
e1

“The data (T2) showed that highest yield recorded (34.46 t ha-1) in comparison to farmer practice (25.54 t ha-1) (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T2 benefit cost ratio was 1.56 compared with 1.42 for T1.

Treatment
T2e0
Outcome
BC Ratioe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.56e0
Qualifier
1.42e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“BC Ratio 1.56 (T2) and 1.42 (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 had higher net profit than T1.

Treatment
T2e0
Outcome
net prote0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“high net prot (T2) over (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number, fruit weight and marketable yield were highest under T2 relative to T1.

Treatment
T2 (ICM practices)e0
Outcome
number of fruits, fruit weight and marketable yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of fruits, fruit weight and marketable yield were highest in T2 (ICM practices) over T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated crop management decreased blotchy ripening and sun-scalding incidence.

Outcome
incidence of physiological disorders (blotchy ripening, sun-scalding)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“decreased the incidence of physiological disorders (blotchy ripening, sun-scalding)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated crop management decreased fruit borer incidence.

Treatment
ICM practicese1
Interactor
fruit borere0pest
Outcome
pest-disease incidence (fruit borer and blight infestation)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“decreased the incidence of physiological disorders (blotchy ripening, sun-scalding) and pest-disease incidence (fruit borer and blight infestation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1710 · show in text ↑
e1

“The adoption of ICM practices shows positive impact on yield (34.46 t ha-1) and economics of tomato through adoption of ICM practices and also decreased the incidence of physiological disorders (blotchy ripening, sun-scalding) and pest-disease incidence (fruit borer and blight infestation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated crop management decreased blight infestation.

Treatment
ICM practicese1
Outcome
blight infestatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“decreased the incidence of physiological disorders (blotchy ripening, sun-scalding) and pest-disease incidence (fruit borer and blight infestation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1710 · show in text ↑
e1

“The adoption of ICM practices shows positive impact on yield (34.46 t ha-1) and economics of tomato through adoption of ICM practices and also decreased the incidence of physiological disorders (blotchy ripening, sun-scalding) and pest-disease incidence (fruit borer and blight infestation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1710 · show in text ↑