Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In a cage experiment, parasitism by Anagrus of leafhopper eggs on grapes was greater when adults had access to flowering buckwheat than to buckwheat without flowers.

A claim from Influence of flowering cover crops on Anagrus parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) and Erythroneura leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in New York vineyards · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a cage experiment, parasitism by Anagrus of leafhopper eggs on grapes was greater when adults had access to flowering buckwheat than to buckwheat without flowers.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
flowering buckwheate0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Second interactor
AnagrusAnagruse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitism by Anagrus of leafhopper eggse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
buckwheat without flowerse0
Setting
cage experimente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anagrus
Anagrus · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHd93129 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a cage experiment, parasitism by Anagrus of leafhopper eggs on grapes was greater when adults had access to flowering buckwheat rather than buckwheat without flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1220

Title

Influence of flowering cover crops on Anagrus parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) and Erythroneura leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in New York vineyards

Greg English‐Loeb; Marc Rhainds; Tim Martinson; et al. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1461-9563.2003.00179.x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2ed36f85f3c51d7d8166d8b260ccedd85e92a3ba6aba766e7b0d162462120540 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

stage · pest · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.