Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Growth trends in dry weight and leaf area of dark-treated plants were similar to those of untreated plants.

A claim from Physiological and Ecological Analyses of Shade Tolerance of Plants 2. Growth of Dark-treated Green-gram under Varying Light Intensities · 1962

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth trends in dry weight and leaf area of dark-treated plants were similar to those of untreated plants.

Treatment
dark-treated DN- and DO-seriese2
Outcome
trends of growth, in dry weight as well as in leaf areae2
Direction
similare2
Comparator
untreated N- and O-seriese2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dark-treated Green-gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–103
e2

“The trends of growth, in dry weight as well as in leaf area, of the dark-treated DN- and DO-series were similar to those of the untreated N- and O-series”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–448

Title

Physiological and Ecological Analyses of Shade Tolerance of Plants 2. Growth of Dark-treated Green-gram under Varying Light Intensities

Masami MONSI; Hideo IWAKI; Susumu KURAISHI; et al. Shokubutsugaku Zasshi 1962. doi:10.15281/jplantres1887.75.185

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-2ed66f4e14a4378888247396b44308b0d00b67c6448dc7891a8c7a792dbfb2d5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

light · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.