Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Shank/coulter strip tillage reduced tillage costs by $36.50/ha.

A claim from Strip Tillage for Sweet Corn Production: Yield and Economic Return · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shank/coulter strip tillage reduced tillage costs by $36.50/ha.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
shank/coulter strip tillage systeme0
Outcome
tillage costse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
$36.50/hae0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–28
e0

“The shank/coulter strip tillage system reduced tillage costs by $36.50/ha compared to conventional tillage ( P = 0.003)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1207

Title

Strip Tillage for Sweet Corn Production: Yield and Economic Return

John M. Luna; Mary L. Staben HortScience 2002. doi:10.21273/hortsci.37.7.1040

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-2fcb52b7cc1f0d1552f6dad8c95b94a3fb2a4279e7e01230da1ee4ef5ed3b59f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Corn silage yield did not differ significantly among tillage systems except in one year.

    Tillage Effects on Corn Emergence, Silage Yield, and Labor and Fuel Inputs in Double Cropping with Wheat · 2005

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Strip tillage reduced husked-ear yield by 7% in 1982 versus conventional tillage.

    Effect of Tillage on Sweet Corn Development and Yield · 1986 · compared with conventional tillage

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect
    The average annual maize yields in strip tillage were slightly greater than under NT and CT, but the differences were not significant.

    Influence of Tillage on the Mollisols Physicochemical Properties, Seed Emergence and Yield of Maize in Northeast China · 2021 · compared with NT and CT

    No difference from an alternativeCites this paper

  4. no effect
    Cover-crop no-tillage and standard no-tillage gave similar corn yields.

    Potential Long‐Term Benefits of No‐Tillage and Organic Cropping Systems for Grain Production and Soil Improvement · 2007 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    No-till produced less corn grain than plow tillage.

    Tillage and Rotation Interactions for Corn and Soybean Grain Yield as Affected by Precipitation and Air Temperature · 2004 · compared with plow

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Tillage had no grain-yield effect in manure or compost plots in three of four years.

    Composted and Noncomposted Manure Application to Conventional and No‐Tillage Systems: Corn Yield and Nitrogen Uptake · 1999

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    No-tillage corn grain yield was 5% lower than under conventional tillage.

    Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System · 2003 · compared with conventional tillage system

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Continuous no-till corn on Chalmers soil was 2% wetter at harvest than plowed corn.

    Long‐Term Tillage and Rotation Effects on Corn Growth and Yield on High and Low Organic Matter, Poorly Drained Soils · 1988 · compared with plowing

    Opposite direction

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.