Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Shank/coulter strip tillage gave yields comparable to conventional tillage.

A claim from Strip Tillage for Sweet Corn Production: Yield and Economic Return · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shank/coulter strip tillage gave yields comparable to conventional tillage.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
shank/coulter strip tillage systeme0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–28
e0

“The shank/coulter strip tillage system produced yields comparable to conventional tillage ( P = 0.95).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–889

Title

Strip Tillage for Sweet Corn Production: Yield and Economic Return

John M. Luna; Mary L. Staben HortScience 2002. doi:10.21273/hortsci.37.7.1040

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-1437c8ffef8dd3c931130b3624edfc4cd3b5e7252a867b25e044cce42125c767 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this claim · 811 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Corn silage yield did not differ significantly among tillage systems except in one year.

    Tillage Effects on Corn Emergence, Silage Yield, and Labor and Fuel Inputs in Double Cropping with Wheat · 2005

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    The average annual maize yields in strip tillage were slightly greater than under NT and CT, but the differences were not significant.

    Influence of Tillage on the Mollisols Physicochemical Properties, Seed Emergence and Yield of Maize in Northeast China · 2021 · compared with NT and CT

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. negative
    Strip tillage reduced husked-ear yield by 7% in 1982 versus conventional tillage.

    Effect of Tillage on Sweet Corn Development and Yield · 1986 · compared with conventional tillage

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. positive
    No-tillage was associated with higher corn yields.

    Influence of No‐tillage on Soil Moisture1 · 1971

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    CA improved maize grain yield, especially in two- or three-year rotations.

    ROTATION IN CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE SYSTEMS OF ZAMBIA: EFFECTS ON SOIL QUALITY AND WATER RELATIONS · 2010

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Subsoil tillage increased grain yield of spring maize by 12.8% on average compared with conventional soil treatment.

    Effect of subsoil tillage depth on nutrient accumulation, root distribution, and grain yield in spring maize · 2014 · compared with conventional soil treatment

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    In 1983 strip or no tillage with soybean rotation raised corn grain yield by 12%.

    Influence of Tillage and Crop Rotation on Yields of Corn, Soybean, and Wheat · 1988

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    In Lemu, CA monocrop maize yielded 2.7 Mg ha −1 more than conventional tillage in 2009/10.

    Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality · 2012 · compared with conventional tillage

    No difference from an alternative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.